Daughter-In-Law Cannot Occupy Father-In-Law’s & Mother In Law House
A case from Muzaffarpur, Bihar, regarding the seizure of property by the in-laws reached the Supreme Court. In this case, a woman claimed the right to the house of her mother-in-law and father-in-law. But the mother-in-law and father-in-law got justice from the Supreme Court.
Daughter-in-law cannot occupy father-in-law’s house. The Supreme Court has given such a verdict after hearing a case from Bihar. The Supreme Court has upheld the verdict of the Patna High Court. A woman illegally occupied her father-in-law’s house. An elderly couple from Bihar approached the court regarding this. The case had reached the Supreme Court. While announcing its verdict today, the Supreme Court has made observations regarding the right of the daughter-in-law over the property of the father-in-law’s house.
A case from Muzaffarpur, Bihar, regarding the encroachment of the in-laws’ house property reached the Supreme Court. In this case, a woman claimed the right to the house of her mother-in-law and father-in-law. But the mother-in-law and father-in-law got justice from the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has dismissed the daughter-in-law’s petition. As a result, the daughter-in-law, who had encroached on the house of her mother-in-law and father-in-law in Dighara, Sadar police station area of Muzaffarpur district, has received a big setback from the Supreme Court.
CHECK MORE : what is ama sasana bybasta in odisha
The Supreme Court has upheld the verdict of the Patna High Court. The Supreme Court said that the woman will have to live in an alternative residence provided by her husband. The daughter-in-law forcibly occupied the ancestral house of her mother-in-law and father-in-law one and a half years ago. There was also CCTV footage of the incident. All this incident took place in the presence of the police. The Supreme Court expressed its displeasure over this.
About one and a half years ago, in a family dispute, the daughter-in-law illegally occupied her father-in-law’s house in the presence of the police. The matter then reached the court. The lower court ruled in favor of the aggrieved father-in-law and ordered the daughter-in-law to vacate the house, but the daughter-in-law rejected the court order and approached the High Court. But the woman lost in the High Court as well. The High Court ruled that the woman had no right to occupy her father-in-law’s house. She would have to vacate the house.
The woman challenged the High Court’s verdict and approached the Supreme Court. But the appeal was dismissed in the first hearing itself. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s verdict. The Supreme Court said that if both the parties want, they can resolve the dispute through mediation. This is the first incident in the district that has reached the Supreme Court of the country. In such a situation, this case has become a topic of discussion in the entire region. The biggest thing is that the woman was sitting in the house of the elderly couple in the presence of the police.
The video of the entire incident has also surfaced. All the images were captured on the CCTV camera installed in the house. In 2024, a daughter-in-law named Nancy Kashyap forcibly entered her father-in-law’s ancestral house. This act was done in collaboration with the police. The Supreme Court has said that the daughter-in-law has no right to occupy her father-in-law’s house, she will have to vacate the house. The divorce case of the woman and her husband is currently pending in the court. In such a situation, a woman does not have the right to forcibly enter the house. The Supreme Court has ruled to submit a statement to the Sadar police station in this regard.
ALSO READ : Govt Job For Graduate : Know Where The Recruitment For Graduates Is Going On These Days?
